Chambers & Partners 2025: (Employment) "He is also concise and able to explain things that need explaining." "Paul is considered and quick on his feet, thoughtful in terms of when he challenges and doesn't." "Paul is brilliant at demystifying complex matters."

Legal 500 2025: "Oozes authority in and out of court."

Who’s Who Legal 2024: Recommended as a ‘Thought Leader’ for Labour, Employment & Benefits.

Chambers & Partners 2024: “Paul is very approachable, pragmatic and commercially aware as well as being the top equal pay barrister around.” “He is the epitome of calm, measured counsel, inspiring great respect and gratitude from clients.” “Paul is my KC of choice. He is really good at dealing with witnesses. He is thorough and client-friendly. He puts everyone at ease and gets his point across without the use of a sledgehammer”. “Paul Epstein KC is a talented advocate who handles high-profile employment cases at all levels of the judicial system. He has a strong reputation for working on discrimination issues but is also an authority in matters concerning equal pay and whistle-blowing.”

Legal 500 2024: “Paul is a first-class advocate; forensic and has an exceptional intellect. He is excellent at putting nervous clients at ease with his open manner.”

Who’s Who Legal 2023: Paul Epstein KC is a seasoned employment specialist who “speaks with real authority” in court who wins approval for being “feisty and innovative where necessary but also personable and commercially sensible”.

Chambers & Partners 2023: "Paul is an exceptional KC who is impressive on his feet and fantastic with clients." "He is razor-sharp, responsive and incredibly knowledgeable in relation to equal pay." "Paul has a calm but persuasive style of advocacy which is very effective."

Legal 500 2023: “A favourite silk for employment matters. He is clever, incisive, approachable and considerate, and he performs well under pressure, quickly winning the confidence of demanding clients. His delivery before the tribunal is low-key – no frills and very effective.”

Who's Who Legal 2022: "Paul Epstein QC comes highly recommended for his wealth of experience in advising on equal opportunities. He is highly regarded for his defence of the Jimmy Savile whistle-blower."

Chambers & Partners 2022: "Paul Epstein is extremely authoritative. He is pragmatic, he is approachable and he inspires a great deal of confidence." "He is an outstanding advocate who gives very clear and commercially focused advice, and he is very down to earth and practical."

Legal 500 2022: "Super-bright, very calm in a crisis, client friendly, and excellent at providing good strategic advice. Very happy to chat around issues and arguments – an excellent team player."

Chambers & Partners 2021: "He's incredibly effective and an amazing communicator." "He's super to work with, very responsive and among the top equal pay barristers in the country."

Legal 500 2021: “A fantastic QC for complex matters and a brilliant strategist.”

Chambers & Partners 2020: "He is deft in providing advice on difficult issues; he is tactically astute, exceptionally thorough and has wide-ranging legal expertise." "A very knowledgeable and high-quality silk who is also easy to work with."

Legal 500 2020: "A masterly silk; deft in providing difficult advice, tactically astute and exceptionally thorough."

Chambers & Partners 2019: "A talented advocate who handles high-profile employment cases at all levels of the judicial system. He has a reputation for working on discrimination issues but is also proficient in matters concerning equal pay and whistle-blowing." "A masterly silk who is tactically astute and exceptionally thorough." "Very approachable and knowledgeable. He is particularly skilled in advocacy and negotiation, and he has very good drafting skills."

Legal 500 2019: “A friendly, knowledgeable and approachable advocate.”

Chambers and Partners 2018: “A masterly silk, who brings together the qualities one needs for important cases. He is deft in providing difficult advice, tactically astute, exceptionally thorough, and he has a wide ranging legal expertise. He is great to work with for both solicitors and clients.”

Chambers & Partners 2017: “He is a very good strategist; he combines amazing knowledge of the law with a very commercial and strategic approach to litigation… He is an assured and authoritative silk who is a real team player and is popular with instructing solicitors and clients.”

Legal 500 2017: “A genius and a devastatingly articulate advocate who knows just how to make his points to maximal effect.”

Who's Who Legal 2017: One of the ten "most highly regarded" employment silks."

Chambers & Partners 2016: "A skilful advocate and tactician," who is "very can-do and innovative." "An assured and authoritative silk who is a real team player."

Legal 500 2016: "He has a strong command of his practice area, and a good tactical brain."

Chambers & Partners 2012: “Frequently instructed in heavyweight discrimination claims," and "brilliant on his feet."

Legal 500 2012: "A formidable opponent."

2015 Appointed to A panel of Equality and Human Rights Commission

2012, 2014 and 2016 elected Employment Lawyers Association management committee member

2012 Bencher of Middle Temple

Chair of Middle Temple Diveristy and Inclusion Committee

2012 Qualified Mediator

2009-2011 Chair of the Employment Law Bar Association

Member of the Industrial Law Society and the Administrative Law Bar Association

Contributed to publications including Tolley's Working Time, Bullen & Leake & Jacob's Precedents of Pleading (2001), Butterworths Employment Law Guide (2000), IRS Eclipse Competencies (2001).

Paul is sought after as an expert speaker, and has given many talks over the years, including to EU judges on discrimination at the EU legal academy in Trier, Germany; in France; in the Netherlands; and for many firms and organisations; and he has been an expert commentator on TV, radio and in the press.

Paul is an advocacy trainer for Middle Temple.

Oxford University, Balliol College, History and Modern Languages, First

City University Diploma in Law, Distinction

• Instructed by Tesco in defending multi-party equal pay claims.

• K & Ors v Tesco [2021] ICR 1524, Case C-624/19. Last case referred by UK to European Court of Justice before Brexit. CJEU decided that art.157 has direct effect in an equal value claim.

• Instructed by Asda in defending multi-party equal pay claims

• Kinlay v Brontë Film & Television Ltd , July 2021. Decision not to cast actor in next series of JK Rowling production for BBC because she was pregnant was unlawful discrimination. Landmark case on discrimination and pregnant actors.

• Counsel to Equality and Human Rights Commission investigation into pay of women at the BBC

• Counsel to Equality and Human Rights Commission investigation into discrimination by the Metropolitan Police in its handling of complaints

• Aarons v Secretary of State for Home Department, Paul acted for seven police staff associations in relation to claims by 15,000 officers that government discriminated on age grounds in introducing new police pensions.

• Farmah v Birmingham City Council [2017] IRLR 785, ICR 921, EAT Whether multiple claimants can be included on a single claim form.

• AB v Ministry of Justice [2014] EWHC 1847 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 14 (Jul) Leading authority on level of compensation for distress for breach of data protection legislation.

• Abdulla v. Birmingham City Council [2012] UKSC 47 (Supreme Court); [2012] ICR 20, [2012] IRLR 116, [2011] EWCA Civ 1412 (CA); [2011] IRLR 309, [2010] EWHC 3303 (QB)(HC), and Ashby v Birmingham City Council [2012] ICR 1, [2011] IRLR 473, [2011] 4 All ER 182, [2011] EWHC 424 (QB) (HC); jurisdiction of the courts to entertain equal pay claims.

• Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2012] ICR 280, [2011] EAT/0016/11 (EAT); funded by EHRC, direct disability discrimination, reasonable adjustments, cost of adjustments.

• Lord Ashcroft v Foley and Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 423; [2011] EMLR 30 (HC); defamation claim brought by Lord Ashcroft against owner of Independent newspaper, editor and journalist over Turks and Caicos articles.

• Joseph v Spiller [2010] ICR 642, [2010] EMLR 7, [2009] EWCA Civ 1075 (CA); defamation case also raising employment agency arguments (in the Supreme Court now the leading case on honest comment)

• Re Al Mal Bank LLC, and Nazim Omara August 2010; case in the Qatar Financial Centre Civil and Commercial Court; concerning liquidation of bank (related judgment, No. 04/10)

• Amnesty International v Ahmed [2009] ICR 1450, [2009] IRLR 884, [2009] EAT/0447/08(EAT); leading case on direct discrimination

• Arnold v Sandwell MBC [2009] ICR 1011, [2009] IRLR 452, [2009] EWCA Civ 309 (CA); [2009] ICR 281, [2009] IRLR 12, [2008] EAT/0332/08 (EAT); s32 grievances in EqPA claims

• Spencer v SOS Work and Pensions [2009] QB 358, [2009] 2 WLR 593, [2008] ICR 1359, [2008] IRLR 911, [2008] EWCA Civ 750 (CA); leading case on applicable time limits for bringing Francovich claims

• R (McCarthy) v Basildon DC [2009] EWCA Civ 13, [2009] BGLR 1013, (2009) 4 EG 117 (CS),[2009] EWCA Civ 13 (CA); [2008] EWHC 987 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 118, (2008) 19 EG 205 (CS), [2008] EWHC 9897 (Admin) (HC); action by Council to evict Irish Travellers from Dale Farm in Essex

• Dow (Nos. 1 & 2) v. Cumbria [2008] IRLR 91, 109, No. 1 [2007] EAT/0148/06 (EAT), No. 2 [2007] EAT/0148/06 (EAT); equal pay

• Copland v UK (App No. 62617/00), [2007] All ER (D) 32; European Court of Human Rights case on whether covert surveillance by employer breached EConv

• Dearlove v. Combs [2007] EWHC 375 (Ch), [2008] EMLR 2, [2007] All E.R. (D) 367; passing off claim, acting for Puff Daddy

• Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein v. Adebayo [2005] IRLR 514, [2005] EAT/0569/04 (EAT) race discrimination claim by derivatives trader, drawing of inferences

• Saggar v. Ministry of Defence [2005] ICR 1073, [2005] IRLR 618, [2005] EWCA Civ 413(CA); [2004] ICR 1708, [2004] EAT/0385/01 (EAT); territorial scope of pre Equality Act 2010 discrimination statutes

• Walton v Independent Living Organisation [2003] ICR 608, [2003] IRLR 469 (CA); minimum wage, working time

• Triesman v Ali [2002] ICR 1026, [2002] IRLR 489 (CA); Labour Party, local elections, race discrimination, suspension

• Dickinson v Rushmer [2002] 1 Costs LR 128 (HC); costs, privilege

Exhibition to Balliol College

Middle Temple Harmsworth scholarship